r/MurderedByWords May 30 '23

'Free speech' lesson.

Post image
694 Upvotes

78 comments sorted by

142

u/tw_72 May 30 '23

To be clear - you can SAY whatever you want. It's just that some of the stuff you say comes with consequences.

27

u/Axhen May 30 '23

I've been playing Pathfinder Kingmaker for a while (video game based on the TTRPG)

In there there's a group of kingdoms that share different values. The first one goed something like this (big paraphrasing here) "1st freedom is the freedom of speevh. No one can stop you from speaking freely. However, that doesn't protect you from being stabbed"

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

Stabbing someone is illegal though. Insulting someone is not.

In that scenario the one reaction with violence is worse then the one insulting them.

3

u/Wyldfire2112 May 31 '23

Actually, most places have "mutual combat" laws, which say that if two people agree to an act of violence there is no crime committed. It's why boxing and MMA are legal.

A number of areas also include "provocation" or "fighting words" clauses in their legal code that state uttering insults obviously designed to provoke a person to violence is implicitly consenting to being a part of that violence. Usually bare-knuckle only, mind you. No weapons.

In other words, if you ask for it you don't get to complain when you get it. Stabbing someone would be illegal because of the knife, but you'd be just fine breaking their nose.

2

u/CatastrophicPup2112 May 31 '23

I thought only Texas had the fighting words thing.

2

u/Wyldfire2112 May 31 '23

Nah, Texas is just the most famous for it... because Texas is Texas. The only place where the idea of consenting mutual combat and the provocation defense are both explicitly banned is Oregon.

Even the states where there aren't provisions in the legal code for one or the other, or both, there's a practical level where the investigating officer or the courts will frequently decide not to pursue things because it wouldn't look good to a jury.

I mean, if you were presented a case where a gay man was on trial for punching out someone that just spent the last 10 minutes screaming at him about how he's a child-diddling f****t and will burn in hell would you vote to convict?

2

u/Bursuc23 Jun 01 '23

Only three states have specific laws related to mutual combat: Washington, Texas, and Oregon. In Oregon, mutual combat is illegal, and participants can be charged with disorderly conduct. In contrast, in Washington and Texas, mutual combat is legal under specific circumstances. -google

-3

u/[deleted] May 31 '23 edited May 31 '23

I don’t believe you. Show me.

Also: You can only let yourself be offended. If you have such low self esteem that you have to respond with violence when some nobody insults you, you are just a coward and a pussy imo.

A strong person simply ignores idiots and don’t let themselves get wound up.

Why value the opinions and insults of some moron?

2

u/Wyldfire2112 May 31 '23

Didn't realize it was you I was replying to twice before, and I'm not duplicating my replies. Deal with it.

-3

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

Same here, I said what I want to in the other comment.

1

u/Axhen May 31 '23

As i said, it's in the pathfinder world. It's a world of fantasy with dragons and bandits and sorcerers everywhere. I just love that prhasing though, because it means actions have consequences. Sometimes those consequences are completely disproportionate, but since there was a guy killed in front of his child at a starbucks only because he asked someone not to vape in his daughter's face a few months ago, it's not as if things like that dont happen irl. I dont condone violence, especially in that example that's just horrendous and terridying, but i'm not everyone here and some people just dont understand that stabbing is not the solution to problems

43

u/Smart_Ass_Dave May 30 '23

Ya, Anon is responsible for the damage he has done to Ricky Gervais' reputation. Which is nothing because everyone already knows he's a twat.

4

u/tw_72 May 30 '23

Yeah - Ricky is def the biggest problem in Ricky's career. He says some bloody cringe-worthy stuff - thinking it's funny.

11

u/Bit-Random May 30 '23 edited May 30 '23

The guy is famous for it and rich as a result. I don’t think he sees it as a problem. It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.

2

u/GuyYouMetOnline May 31 '23

He's never been quite to my preference, but plenty of people find him funny. Others do t, of course, and both ways are fine.

1

u/Fullpoint9 May 30 '23

He seems to be doing just fine

1

u/Slamdog42 May 31 '23

It's because it's funny - that's why it's funny.

1

u/Bursuc23 Jun 01 '23

Navin. Navin Dissanayake is anon. posted yesterday also

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

LEGAL consequences. If you physically attack someone just cause they insult you, no matter how vile; you are still the one breaking the law.

People sometimes forget that punching someone in the face for calling them slurs is NOT simply “consequences” but illegal and in that example the one throwing the punch is worse then the one that insulted them and will be the one getting arrested.

0

u/[deleted] May 31 '23 edited 14d ago

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '23 edited May 31 '23

Can you name some of them cause I am certain they don’t include any western country.

For the mutual combat law both parties need to consent.

Violence is simply illegal. Words should be countered with words.

But besides that: If you react with violence you are the coward imo. You can only be offended if you let yourself be offended.

If you need to respond with violence to words you are probably very insecure to let those words get to you in the first place.

1

u/Wyldfire2112 May 31 '23 edited May 31 '23

Then you're quite certainly wrong.

I live in the US, so that's where I'm familiar with. Two states have explicit, full-coverage, to-the-death mutual combat laws, while most of the others have more limited and situational laws, and only one explicitly bans even consenting combat.

Canada also adds "consent" as an exception to assault and battery charges.

Beyond that, given the history of dueling to settle disputes throughout the western world, I wouldn't be surprised if it was pretty well-spread to anywhere whose government can be traced back to colonization.

You speak with all the naive certainty of someone who has never been seriously threatened or provoked. I hope you never have cause to lose your innocence.

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

Then show me those laws. And still both parties need to consent.

If they insulting person does not consent your reaction with violence will still be illegal and frankly: imo you are much MUCH worse when you use violence then when you use even the most vile insults.

I have been threatened and insulted plenty of times. I simply ignore it and move on. Why would I care about the opinions of morons?

1

u/Wyldfire2112 May 31 '23

Dude, first, I honestly don't care enough about you to go look up legal codes at nearly three in the morning.

The point, however, is that by going up to someone and using language designed to provoke a violent response they are providing implicit consent.

Also, remember, you started this by saying "no matter how vile."

Fighting words laws aren't about casual insults like you've experienced... and any provocation you can laugh off as "the opinions of morons" is absolutely casual.

No, those laws are for sustained, aggravated verbal diarrhea that is designed for no other purpose than to get under the recipient's skin and work on their nerves until they retaliate. Think shit like a racist getting up in a black man's face and calling him everything but his name, with liberal usage of n****r thrown in.

They exist to stop shitheads like that from baiting out a swing, then using that to press charges and get their victim in legal trouble, by acknowledging that a person can only be expected to take so much before retaliating.

0

u/[deleted] May 31 '23 edited May 31 '23

You are simply wrong, there are no laws like that. You can’t show proof.

No they are not giving consent. You can make excuses for your cowardice all you want there is no excuse for using violence in response to words.

The one using violence is ALWAYS the bad guy in this scenario period.

If you are so weak you respond with violence to racist slurs etc you are the criminal and should be arrested.

Hate speech does not exist.

You seem like an angry insecure guy that builds his values from the opinions of others. That is just being weak, plain and simple.

Ever heard of “be the better person?”

2

u/Wyldfire2112 May 31 '23

Hate speech does not exist.

If you're sheltered enough you really think this then, again, I really hope you get to keep living in your bubble.

On the other hand, I'm beginning to think you're actually a bigoted little shitstain that likes to pull that crap yourself and you don't like being called out on it. If that's the case you should do the world a favor and goosestep your way off a cliff.

Either way, since you've completely devolved into insults, personal attacks, and calling me a liar, we're done here.

0

u/cyclopeon Jun 01 '23

By fighting words... Do you mean how the first amendment does not protect fighting words? Cuz there's literally no law in the United States where you can kill someone because they said something mean to you 🤣

Mutual combat laws exist in two states, far as I can tell, but does not apply to the situation you describe.

0

u/Bursuc23 Jun 03 '23

nothing to do with the legality of combat sport

2

u/WanderingFlumph May 31 '23

Does that mean there is freedom of speech in Russia?

Speak out against Putin and fall out of a window, no freedom of speech violations here just actions having consequences

26

u/michilio May 30 '23

Free speech is not a concept limited to the US firstly, the rest of the world also has (varying degrees) of free speech (laws) and laws that define what´s not free speech. Most democracies with free speech have limits on inciting violence and hatespeech. Like the one Ricky Gervais is a citizen of for instance.

And... Pretty sure even in the free-est free speechiest country on earth you can´t incite violence or defame or slander somebody without being held responsible.

I seem to recall an ex-president who on one hand loved telling his supporters he was going to tighten slander laws, or in his words: "open up libel laws" so he could sue people, and on the other hand just had to fork over 3 million dollar for defamation himself

But yeah. There´s Ricky Gervais fake point. And you can call people hateful slurs in the US without government interference.

9

u/Wookimonster May 30 '23

God, Ricky Gervais used to be entertaining, but all the entertaining bits of his acts are striped out and the only thing left is the edge-lording.

-4

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

Remember the Democrats cheering on the BLM riots?

“People do what they do.” - Nancy Pelosi in response to people getting killed, stores being looted and millions in damage being caused.

Both parties are vile and corrupt. Both cheer on violence towards their enemies. All politicians just care about their own money and power.

Trump was an absolute narcissistic lunatic. But Biden and his administration are not any better.

9

u/Babki123 May 30 '23

This is an extremely weird interaction.
One name is blured but not the other,
Why would the dude explaining that free speech should not be used weirldy suddenly use it in this obvious situation.

I think this is a weird case of suicide by word attempts disguised as a murder

4

u/BarfMenagerie Jun 11 '23

I can’t believe how many people there are who STILL don’t understand the definition of free speech. Including Gervais and the other guy in the screenshot.

What “free speech” actually means is you can speak out against/protest your government without being arrested for it. It is not carte blanche to be a general douche, which has legal consequences if someone on the receiving end of douchery can prove in court it caused actual harm to their well-being or finances.

6

u/juicedeucer May 30 '23

Did they really not see that one coming??

5

u/Babki123 May 30 '23

This is obviously one dude talking to himself

3

u/Karpaltunnel83 May 31 '23

Lying to intentionally harm someones reputation is in fact illegal

2

u/JRFisher85 May 30 '23

Is it me or does the first guy just point out slander, libel, and defamation?

2

u/Stabbmaster May 31 '23

Um, actually, you can't damage a reputation with lies. That's called slander, and there are legitimate consequences for it.

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

LEGAL consequences. If you physically attack someone just cause they insult you, no matter how vile; you are still the one breaking the law.

People sometimes forget that punching someone in the face for calling them slurs is NOT simply “consequences” but illegal and in that example the one throwing the punch is worse then the one that insulted them and will be the one getting arrested.

4

u/PrinceofallRabbits May 30 '23

Fuck Ricky Gervais.

5

u/Mortwight May 30 '23

What did he do?

16

u/Rantman021 May 30 '23

He's a transphobic cunt who can't handle criticism when people call him out for punching down on a group of people who are already dealing with national hate in many nations with people (in the US at least) spouting genocidal rhetoric.

He's also not funny to me, so there is that.

-2

u/Ginganinja2308 May 31 '23

Another guy who doesn't understand jokes huh

-10

u/Candlelighter May 30 '23

So there are things you can't joke about?

10

u/Rantman021 May 30 '23

Technically no but how many people joke about the holocaust or the civil rights movement? Some things just aren't funny and making fun of a people that were or are facing genocide is one of those things.

There's a general rule in comedy "don't punch down" that is usually accepted but not everyone follows. Essentially, comedy is a force meant to make fun of the "higher" people in the world but a lot of people who like to pander to bigots tend to punch down on minority groups

-1

u/Candlelighter May 30 '23

Humour is subjective isn't it? What some might find funny might not be what you find funny. And that's ok. Some jokes just aren't funny and they don't get laughs. Punishing comedians though has the effect of censorship where fewer comedians dare to touch certain subjects due to fear of backlash. To me that's the same as a authoritarian regime imposing rules on what you can or can't say.

5

u/Repelaleper May 31 '23

That authoritarian regime being the checks notes court of public opinion. What are you even talking about? If you make a shitty joke and your audience points out that it isn't funny, that isn't censorship or oppression. It's just you being bad at your job

6

u/Repelaleper May 31 '23

Unless you mean getting deplatformed by Twitter or Netflix or whatever but even then those corporations don't care that you're hurting trans people, they care that you're hurting their bottom line which still comes down to people not finding you funny

-1

u/Candlelighter May 31 '23

Again, humor is subjective. Plenty of comedians are running with 'offensive' rhetoric in their acts. Gervais is both famous and rich so at least some find him funny.

Calling comedians "transphobic cunt" is of course your right but connecting jokes with genocidal ideations is both extremist and wild.

Jokes can be in poor taste and if they're not funny then they're not funny. Saying there are groups you can't joke about is to me dehumanizing.

2

u/PrinceofallRabbits May 31 '23

You don’t like the backlash? Well that’s just free speech baby. Isn’t that what you want, people able to say whatever they want regardless of who it hurts?

1

u/Candlelighter May 31 '23

This seems very meta considering which thread we're in. You're absolutely allowed to criticize but the line is drawn when threats are thrown in. Saying comedy promotes genocide is absolutely wild.

So again, backlash is fine. You'll notice I've received plenty here and that's ok. That's free speech.

1

u/PrinceofallRabbits May 31 '23

Who’s threatening Ricky though? There’s literally people threatening the lives of trans people and have taken their lives. And yes comedy does promote genocide in some cases. Jokes were made at the expense of Jews in the 1930s and 1940s leading to labeling them as “other” and less than human. This can be said for practically any form of oppression that’s existed throughout history. Pretending comedy doesn’t impact society in good and bad ways is wild.

1

u/Candlelighter May 31 '23

Hey, Godwin's law, I knew we'd get there eventually.

But let's address that. Comedy is meant to provoke laughter in some way. Satire, exaggeration etc etc. Can comedy that relies on hate speech truly be considered comedy? When is the line drawn and who draws it? By the amount of people who get offended? Being offended does not grant one power to exercise what can and can't be said in public discourse. Can one say that your username is offensive and get you banned for example?

One role of comedy is to touch upon sensitive subjects, cause that's where its needed the most - to diffuse tensions and create oxygen where there might be none or little. I'd even go as far as to say that it's the duty or comedy. And then to say that there are groups that you cant joke about is dehumanizing that group. Are they so fragile you can't make fun of them? To me that's like ignoring the tenacity of the trans people, slapping them in he face.

We should all strive to dish out and take jokes, that's an aspect of what makes us human. A fundamentalist to me is someone who is completely devoid of humor. Those who take to violence to silence others.

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/Lazypole May 31 '23 edited May 31 '23

Holy christ brother, take a breath. Don't punch down? Who wrote that rule, you?

One of the most successful comedians in the UK, Frankie Boyle, punches up, down, left, right, you name it. And he's funny. He's made cancer jokes, jokes about Diana, gay jokes, racist jokes, you name it.

But you know what? He's funny, and more importantly, he's joking. You don't get to decide what is and isn't funny, as long as the comedian making the jokes isn't doing it with intent of malice, lighten up.

This is the exact same vibe as Christians telling me not to listen to "that devil metal music". If you don't like it, that's all good, don't apply that to all.

https://youtu.be/Ui5eUpF3iQQ

3

u/Lostthemoon May 31 '23

If you make jokes about a group of people that they can laugh at themselves? You're joking about that group without being offensive. If the group you are joking about gets defensive or outraged? There might be a reason to reevaluate what you call a joke. Especially when it is about minorities and the 'jokes' are based on harmful stereotypes.

Sometimes you can also make a joke with no malicious intent and still cause harm. The intent does play a role, but it is not the sole factor to take into account. It's true that comedy is subjective and that you can punch down, but it's easier to punch up and harder to balance punching down without being distasteful.

Lots of comedians I think just punch down with no thought of balancing it.

0

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

That is your free opinion. But he is also allowed his.

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '23

He couldn’t care less about you.

1

u/QuevedoDeMalVino May 30 '23

He should have left it like that…

1

u/Spike3220 Jun 02 '23

Gervais just playing the twat as usual. Brave little cis boy.

1

u/polyglotpinko Jun 02 '23

Ricky Gervais is a smug, hateful piece of shit.

0

u/RunaroundX May 30 '23

This guy on Twitter was being a typical MAGA, and people were like "well he's from Florida" so I looked and the area he is from isn't that great so I said "that area is white trash" and he's like "thats racism" so I was like "freedom of speech bby". He didn't like that lol.

1

u/H0RUS_SETH May 31 '23

Hey man, "white trash" can be considerd an insult and, therefore, could be illegal in certain countries.

Just saying

2

u/RunaroundX May 31 '23

It was supposed to be an insult. Like I said. Its America there's freedom of speech. Also I would like to know what countries its illegal to be racist in

2

u/H0RUS_SETH May 31 '23

Aside from it being morally wrong, being racist itself is not directly forbidden, but what racists often do (insults, hate-crimes, slander etc.) is for example forbidden in germany

-1

u/Livercoat May 31 '23

Ooooooh, chimpanzee that!

1

u/GuyYouMetOnline May 31 '23

That is some blatant-ass hypocrisy on blurry person's part, goddamn.

1

u/LadyofTheGreyPath Wordcarys Jun 01 '23

You can say whatever the hell you want, just don't complain about the consequences your words may have.

2

u/gravitas_shortage Jul 11 '23

That's literally the definition of "you can't say what the hell you want"

1

u/Das_Guet Jun 02 '23

It is always better to make these people admit to themselves how stupid they are.