r/WhitePeopleTwitter May 26 '23

Something something SiLeNt MaJoRiTy

Post image
37.2k Upvotes

878 comments sorted by

View all comments

56

u/OGRube May 26 '23

Fuck the electoral college. One citizen one vote. What’s the problem?

42

u/oneeyejedi May 26 '23

The problem is the rich would lose. Remember America is less a democracy and more a plutocracy

10

u/internet_commie May 26 '23

Oiligarchy.

0

u/alucardaocontrario May 27 '23

No they wouldn’t. What a naive point of view

9

u/TheChiBanana May 27 '23

Yes! Get rid of the electoral college! And gerrymandering

-13

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

16

u/hicketre2006 May 27 '23

Democracy isn’t about preserving the Republican Party. If they shoot themselves in the foot, then tough. The system is set up to filter out extremist views like we’ve been seeing recently. The only reason they’re still around is the electoral college and gerrymandering. Among a lot of other things. BUT the popular vote sure isn’t one of them.

-3

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

1

u/rmwe2 May 27 '23

The EC isnt a "core part" of the Constitution. Its a quirk, an artifact left over from placating the slave states (which had small voting populations), explicitly negotiated to extend the 3/5ths compromise to the Presidential election, which all non-slavers wanted to be a popular vote. This is plain historical record. The EC was largely irrelevant until modern times, when the GOP decided to abandon any attempt to appeal to urban voters and went all in on a rural vs city strategy, in which the EC provides a structural advantage.

1

u/[deleted] May 28 '23

[deleted]

1

u/rmwe2 May 28 '23

Are you dumb? Thats exactly what I said. Its an artifact from a 200+ year old negotiation around Slavery. That isnt a "core part" of the Constitution, it can be done away with without impacting anything else.

11

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

-2

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

7

u/ckb614 May 27 '23

Each voter should get the same say regardless of where they live.

0

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

4

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

6

u/kms2547 May 27 '23

'If we have an equal say in election outcomes, we won't have an equal say in election outcomes' is what this argument boils down to. It's BS.

5

u/rmwe2 May 27 '23

A conservative in CA has no voice because of the EC and winner takes all allocation of EC seats. There are orders of magnitude's more conservative Californians than there are people in Wyoming total. Rural interests are not the same everywhere. A California orchard owner to rice farmer has different interests than a cattle rancher or homesteader in Wyoming.

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

3

u/workswimplay May 27 '23

Sure, but your alternative is to give rural voters no voice nation wide, which is clearly worse.

No, not no voice nation wide but exactly the same voice as everyone else.

some dude with blue hair from San Francisco.

Ahh mask off moment. You have a prejudice against city folk. Gosh darn their hair dye!

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

1

u/rmwe2 May 27 '23

If rural voters almost always outnumbered urban voters, and we had one vote per person, everyone would be fine with that.

People keep telling you that, and you keep up with your nonsense about having to "have a voice" over "blue haired" city folks. One vote per person gives everyone a voice.

You cant even name these supposed "rural interests" that would be "ignored" if everyone had the same vote.

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

1

u/rmwe2 May 27 '23

One vote per person gives everyone an equal voice. Bizarre that youd call that "anti-democratic". Also bizarre that you frame this as an all or nothing, us against them, issue. Its not.

There are rural people in big states, urban people in small states and folks move from one setting to another all the time. One vote per person gives everyone voice and say.

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)